|






|
A Very Brief History of Litigation
Copyright 2001 Daniel N. Steven
Litigation is as old as civilized history: evidence of
trials exists in the hieroglyphic stone tablets of ancient Egypt and
Mesopotamia, the scrolls of Rome and Greece, and even the ideographs of
the Chinese dynasties.
For instance, Pliny the Youngest (Caius Plinius
Caecilius Secundus Junior) wrote: “If a citizen’s concubine
falleth beneath the wheels of a neighbor’s horse cart, the Praetor
Urbanis should order that the neighbor payeth the cost of the
physician’s cure, in recompense for the citizen’s suffering in being
deprived of the concubine’s services. (Thrice the cost, if the horse
cart shall not be equipped with side-view servants).” Pliny
also implied that rich Romans—regardless of their social class—could
influence the decisions of the Praetor through judicious offerings of
“tribute.” Of course, Pliny’s lisp makes him hard to
understand.
It is also noteworthy that the ancient Romans allowed
law to be practiced directly by the “citizen,” without the necessity of
a representative—a crude practice that was abolished, coincidentally,
shortly before the Fall of the Empire.
Likewise, the third century Chinese scholar Shao Chin
Tse-Tse wrote in his seminal history of the Tang Dynasty, Ten
Percent Fruit Juice, “The way of Confucius required that all
disputes be brought before the Emperor by representatives of noble
lineage, where justice was invariably served in favor of the petitioner
who most enriched the Treasury.”
America, of course, derives its “common law” system from
Olde Englande, in contrast to the “civil law” system of Europe. A
complete discussion of the comparative merits of these systems is
beyond the scope of this article and its author, but can best be
summarized as the judge/jury dichotomy. In the English system, the jury
is paramount; under the European model, it is the judge. Since it is
easier to bribe or intimidate one person than twelve, the jury system
is clearly preferable. This very virtue of the jury system was the
genesis of American law: formulas to divert, sidetrack, and deflect the
jurors from the truth.
|
|
|